this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
911 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

60070 readers
3428 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
911
40% of US electricity is now emissions-free (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
224 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oyo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even current lithium-based battery storage is already cheaper than nuclear.

[–] GabberPiet@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It does not make sense to compare the price of energy storage (lithium batteries), with the price for generating electricity (nuclear energy), or do you mean something else?

[–] oyo@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

People have a hard-on about nuclear being "baseload" power and renewables being intermittent. Solar/wind plus batteries to add dispatchability is a valid comparison to nuclear if you only want to talk about baseload.