this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
1389 points (99.2% liked)

World News

32079 readers
762 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ElectricCattleman@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's basically saying companies need to pay more if they want people in-office. Which makes sense to me. If you want someone to spend time and money to commute they need to compensate for that. You can't ask someone who has been WFH to start coming in without some incentive or else you're basically cutting their pay.

That said, many people won't switch from WFH to in-office for any amount of money.

[–] CodeBlooded@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

Okay, I see what you’re saying and I concur. Thanks for the clarifying comment! 🫡