this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
279 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

58814 readers
5157 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rab@lemmy.ca 27 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I admin a datacenter and hard drives are never going anywhere. Same with tapes.

[–] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I work tech support for a NAS company and the ratio of HDDs to SSDs is roughly 85-15. Sometimes people use SSDs for stuff that requires low latency, but most commonly they're used as a cache for HDDs in my experience.

[–] preasket@lemy.lol 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Not much point in using SSDs in a NAS if it's there just for holding your files

[–] Chobbes@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Lower power usage and smaller and maaaaaaaaybe better reliability. I’d probably do it if it was cost competitive… but it’s not yet.

[–] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 1 points 10 months ago

Smaller doesn't matter if they're going in a 3.5" tray. There are some models that only come with 2.5" trays, but go figure, the only 2.5" model that isn't a 5-figure all-flash enterprise-scale model is one of our least popular models

[–] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

If the NAS supports tiered storage, you benefit from high I/O performance for things like video editing.

My home storage is a NAS connected over 10GbE, I never bothered trying to play games off of it, but I'll bet they'd run great. Read & write over the network at 10 gigabit is faster on a machine with (separate) RAID arrays of SSDs and HDDs than internal SATA3 connectivity which is kind of bonkers for a home user. Plus that has virtual machines and cloud backups running on the NAS side.

[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Work for one of the largest and we literally finished phasing out tape this year lol.

[–] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

In favor of what? Spinning rust, or some other media for archival backups?

[–] Redward@yiffit.net 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s going to the cloud. Soon as we find a way to store data in water

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Microsoft has already proven that underwater data centers are viable - they just need to scale up now

Project Natick Phase 2 - https://natick.research.microsoft.com/