this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
110 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37719 readers
141 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (11 children)

Wouldn't this absolutely hammer the battery though, or at least give the CPU a hard time? My understanding is that offloading the work to a cloud platform means that the processor-intensive inputting, parsing, generating, and outputting operations are done in purpose-built datacentres, and end user devices just receive the prepared answer.

Wouldn't this rinse the battery and increase the overall device temperature for "normal" end users?

Fair warning: I haven't read the two papers outlined in the article.

[–] kattenluik@feddit.nl 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

CPUs can have special hardware accelerators for stuff like this, and you'd be surprised how powerful our little phone CPUs are and how optimized stuff like this can become.

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 9 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Awesome, thanks for the insight.

I'm showing my age here, but much like we had math coprocessors running beside the 286 and 386 gen CPUs to take on floating point operations; then graphics cards offloaded geometry-based math operations to GPU's - are we looking at AI-style die or chips to specifically work on AI functions?

Excuse my oversimplification, this isn't my field of expertise!

[–] terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago

Well, your not too off. Like ASICs are made for mining cryptocurrency. Specialized processing designed for specific computations. This indeed make it's efficiency greater than a general purpose CPU.

[–] deadly4u@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago
[–] kherge@beehaw.org 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Apple added (a while back) what they call a “Neural Engine,” which is hardware dedicated to efficient execution of ML workloads.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_A11

They have been refining it ever since. I would not be surprised if they made advancements in both the hardware and software used for local GAI.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago

And Google did the same with the Tensor Processor Unit in the Pixels.

[–] beefcat@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

not a dedicated chip per se, the trend is to build it directly into the SoC (mobile devices) or the dedicated GPU

load more comments (9 replies)