this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
222 points (97.8% liked)

News

23638 readers
3655 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked a California law that would have banned carrying firearms in most public places, ruling that it violates the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and deprives people of their ability to defend themselves and their loved ones.

The law signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom in September was set to take effect Jan. 1. It would have prohibited people from carrying concealed guns in 26 places including public parks and playgrounds, churches, banks and zoos. The ban would apply whether the person has a permit to carry a concealed weapon or not. One exception would be for privately owned businesses that put up signs saying people are allowed to bring guns on their premises.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

America was founded by guns and it is chock full of them. There is no way to put that genie back in the bottle.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (35 children)

There literally is, it's called a constitutional amendment and they've been enacted many times before.

Of course, there's not the political will for it, because, like I said, The US is so fucking dumb.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"Hey guys, they passed a constitutional amendment. We better turn all our guns in."

-Like 4 Americans

[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Guns wouldn’t disappear overnight ofc. But make owning guns illegal, arrest people who own them and create buyback programs. It might take some time. It might be super fast.

But you know what for sure wouldn’t solve anything? Doing nothing.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Australia did it and it worked pretty well for them. You just make gun ownership illegal, ask for them back in a reasonable timeframe, and then tell the cops to stop murdering unarmed black people for a minute to go chase down the rest of the guns that weren’t turned in at the end of the process. Then when youre done, you disincentivize bad actors by ramping up the penalties for gun possession significantly, and actually enforce those laws.

It’s not hard, just needs to be done.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Like I said:

The US is so fucking dumb

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If people want to be felons that's their choice, but it's absurd to suggest any armed resistance would occur, or matter, in such an instance

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As the previous person said there is no way to get it done. Yes there is something called a constitutional amendment, but if there is no realistic way to get it passed then effectively there is no way to get it done.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As the previous person said there is no way to get it done

The "we've tried nothing and were all out of isdeas" approach...

[–] SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es 3 points 1 year ago

I mean, I think California just tried something. New York, D.C., New Jersey, Illinois/Chicago, and some other places too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago

But you can’t change the constitution!!!

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sure there is. It's easy.

Just start giving black people guns.

The so-called second amendment absolutists will be calling for draconian gun control measures within a week.

[–] Sorgan71@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I'm pro gun and I want most black people to own guns.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We already do that. They're perfectly welcome to defend themselves and even more so given our police.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

They aren't.

And aside from that, that's not the point. The point is that, historically, when black people start arming themselves even the NRA starts calling for gun control.

[–] SmoothIsFast@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, that's because gun control is racist and classist.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Not wanting schools shot up is racist and classiest apparently.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

No that's because the NRA is racist. (And a lot of gun owners, aka the Republican ones, are racist.)

Gun control ends up being racist and classist because that's the gun control that gets bipartisan support.

[–] 52fighters@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I'm 2nd amendment agnostic but I do recognize the fact that policing is different when the population is armed and policing has often been antagonistic to the black community.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

"Arm the homeless"

[–] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Here's a solution:

Ban straw sales/gun show loopholes, improve auditing/background checks, do gun buybacks above rate, and ban AR sales after X date. Bought before the date, you're grandfathered in but can't sell/gift the weapon.

[–] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Here's a solution:

Ban straw sales/gun show loopholes, improve auditing/background checks, do gun buybacks above rate, and ban AR sales after X date. Bought before the date, you're grandfathered in but can't sell/gift the weapon.