this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
620 points (97.3% liked)

World News

39110 readers
2640 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As a Finn I say this is fine. Every military resource that is tied down and not raping and destroying Ukraine is net positive.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Never going to happen. Russia has nukes, remember?

[–] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

how many of them are correctly mantained and in working conditions?

[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Maybe. The issue is we don't know. Are our missile defense systems able to take down that 1%? How reliably? What if that's 5% instead?

It's all a game of probability, and all it takes is 1 missile to slip through. The only 0% chance is if no nukes are fired in the first place.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So does Ukraine, so why hasn't Russia tried anything with them? Oh because there is no winning a Nuclear War, idiot.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Russia isn't threatened behind their own borders by Ukraine. If a NATO army were to invade Russia however, and Putin has his back against the wall, then I'm not sure he wouldn't order that button to be pressed.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I suppose he could threaten foreign nations who breach the borders, but it's not accurate to say they aren't currently threatened behind their own borders. Russia recently lost a major railway connecting to china to the war, and a few months ago there was a military coup that had Putin hiding in a bunker.

[–] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Fair point, but it's still not quite the same as foreign soldiers on russian soil.