this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
86 points (100.0% liked)

196

16245 readers
2361 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
qaz@lemmy.world
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@lemmy.ca
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Qaz@lemmy.ml
qaz@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
86
Gbit rule (lemmy.ml)
submitted 9 months ago by roon@lemmy.ml to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Fascinating, especially that the RX direction saw such varied speeds across the various NICs. Guess that switch wasn't too keen on trying to split the packets evenly. Also -- 1.5Gbit RX in bidirectional mode? ...all I can say is yikes.

Very good to know.

@slice@feddit.de -- you were interested in this too

[โ€“] SteveTech@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

Guess that switch wasn't too keen on trying to split the packets evenly.

Yeah probably, I was just using one of those cheap 2x 10G + 4x 2.5G switches that ServeTheHome recently did a video on, so I would not be surprised if that was the bottle neck here.

I could maybe try buying a few more SFP+ transceivers and using my more trustworthy switches, but that seems too expensive for a project like this.