this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
44 points (81.4% liked)

Fediverse

17555 readers
49 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
44
Default instance blocks should largely replace defederation (nerdica.net)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by masimatutu@nerdica.net to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
61 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Default instance blocks should largely replace defederation

Since what content users might want to see is quite unlikely to match which servers the admins tolerate, choosing instance on the Fediverse can be quite complicated, which is inconvenient and off-putting for new users.

For this reason, and simply that the Fediverse is stronger united, I believe defederation should ideally be reserved for illegal content and extreme cases. If Fediverse platforms would allow instances to simply block the rest for users by default, the user experience would be the same, unless they decide otherwise.

@fediverse #fediverse #defederation

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] KISSmyOS@lemmy.world 58 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Federation copies content from other instances onto an instance admin's server.
So the instance admin, who is responsible for all content on their server, gets to decide if they want that or not.

[โ€“] Masimatutu@mander.xyz 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Although I don't think Beehaw blocks sh.itjust.works because it has content that they are uncomfortable hosting. The main reason is (as usual) the comfort of their users, but to help the Fediverse as a whole, instance blocking might be a more constructive approach.