this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1292 points (93.9% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5830 readers
274 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a questionable headline considering it was police interpreting an existing law (no courts or legislator has weighed in on the incident in the article). Read a better source here: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/10/germany-gaza-protests-crackdown

[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

police interpreting an existing law

That's what the police does. They enforce the law as they understand it.

You're right that it hasn't been tested in court, but that only happens when someone challenges it in court.

It's also important to note that Germany does not have absolute free speech, there are several anti-hate-speech and anti-nazi laws that limit that right, and the police can and does enforce that frequently.

[–] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago

My issue was with the headline and the article not making anything clear. You're not repeating the headline in your argument so I think we're done here.