Programmer Humor

32495 readers

256 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

cat_programmer@lemmy.ml

1125

Network protocols for dummies (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 11 months ago by Sibbo@sopuli.xyz to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] aksdb@feddit.de 51 points 11 months ago (7 children)

There's nothing wrong with UDP. At least not that I know of.

[–] You999@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago (6 children)

https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/alerts/2014/01/17/udp-based-amplification-attacks

[–] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not really a problem with UDP itself, but with some very old protocols like DNS that rely on UDP but can’t be changed because of compatibility. If you’re writing a new service that uses UDP, there’s nothing stopping you from designing it so that it doesn’t provide an opportunity for bandwidth amplification.

[–] PreviouslyAmused@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

It’s technically not a bug if it’s operating as intended

load more comments (4 replies)