this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1243 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

58150 readers
4218 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 73 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Except they want to send you videos. The power is with you, the viewer. Without you, advertisers will have no reason for buying ads. Google can't collect your data either. Realise that you have this power. Youtube is not like electricity or clean water. We can live without it if push comes to the shove.

[–] ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, what they want is to make money off of you, be it through metadata or through advertising. It's just that sending you videos happens to be the model which they use to get the metadata or advertising income.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 9 months ago

If they wanted to make money off of me then they should have kept the Pixel Pass as a thing so I'd have a reason to have YT premium

Or make YT premium worth it

But nah, they'd rather ruin the product I was paying for, so now they get nothing. At least then I'm not paying for it to get worse

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They don't want to send us videos, they want to serve us ads and annoy us into buying Youtube Premium, which someone using adblocker won't see, or need. From their point of view they would win either way - if they successfully block adblockers it either converts us into ad watchers, premium subscribers, or we fuck off and stop using their bandwidth.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's funny because I pay for premium and have noticed a worse experience since this was revealed. They don't seem to check if a user has adblock and pays.

[–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

They don't seem to check if a user has adblock and pays.

They definitely seem to have checks in place for it. I have Family Premium and so far no issues at all.

Edit: to clarify, not a fan of any of this. Just saying it does work for me

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Weird. It's not happening to me today. Maybe it was something else.

[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Well, I don't pay for premium, and I use an adblocker, and I haven't had any problems. Not having a problem doesn't prove anything if they're only targeting a subset of their users...

[–] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The article says that this isn't happening for all users, which indicates that they're still experimenting with it and haven't fully rolled it out yet.

[–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I do have the issue when I'm logged out