this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
29 points (78.4% liked)

JavaScript

1961 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kassuro@feddit.de 22 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I often have the pleasure of refactoring this mess. And sometimes it's not just 2 ternaries but like 4 or 5 thrown together. It took like half an hour to even understand what was going on. If you do this, you are just an evil person...

So I totally support this. Stop this shit...

[–] coloredgrayscale@programming.dev 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

pleasure of refactoring this mess took half an hour to understand

If you can use any of the jetBrains IDE it can rewrite it to if/else with a few clicks (or [alt] +[return])

[–] kassuro@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

Ah that would be helpful. Gotta try that the next time I encounter such a monstrosity.

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This shit always leaves me wondering who even writes this crap. The answer is more often than not a junior that just discovered code golf thinking he’s oh so clever. You learn to appreciate boring code, with experience…

[–] kassuro@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago

Totally agree with you. I'm always an advocate for boring and easy to understand code.

I really don't need an extra layer of complexity just so someone can save a line or two.

[–] SatouKazuma@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

So I'm pretty sure nested ternaries violate one of the Geneva Conventions' optional protocols.

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

Perfect job for ChatGPT.