this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
246 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

59342 readers
5233 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

steerable demand. I’d rather that be nuclear.

Not going to happen. That's not how nuclear works.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Nuclear is steerable for renewables, sure. You wouldn’t use nuclear for frequency management (pumped storage, battery and a few - hopefully never used - gas plants manage frequency) but renewables don’t change their output that quickly. You pretty much know what you’re going to get out of renewable resources tomorrow and you certainly know what you’re going to get out in the next four hours. If nuclear was built to support this planning (with molten salt or other heat store) it could be done very economically. Look at how Sweden manage their nuclear output depending on the amount of wind Denmark has to sell them cheaply.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

I'm struggling to fine anything that says Sweden have used there nuclear power flexibility. That's not even mentioning if they have done it for a good price point.