Technology

58150 readers

4073 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

512

Tesla Cybertruck's stiff structure, sharp design raise safety concerns - experts (www.reuters.com)

submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

246 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Tesla Cybertruck's stiff structure, sharp design raise safety concerns - experts::The angular design of Tesla's Cybertruck has safety experts concerned that the electric pickup truck's stiff stainless-steel exoskeleton could hurt pedestrians and cyclists.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I'd like to see the information debunking this. In my area, 89% of power is from fossil fuels. My naive understanding of this is that this will still generate emissions, although I would expect the capabilities of reducing harmful emissions to be much better at a power plant instead of having to build it into every vehicle. So my thinking is that emissions are still happening, just not necessarily where people are living and with better emissions management.

Damn, the parent comment to mine got deleted, so nobody will see this anyway.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 4 points 9 months ago

You don't really need sources for this, just apply some basic sense.

So my thinking is that emissions are still happening, just not necessarily where people are living and with better emissions management.

Yes, that is part of it.

Here are some other cliffnotes:

Even when using 100% coal, you're still producing far less CO2 than an equivalent gasoline vehicle.
Gasoline only comes from one place: Extracted and refined dinosaur carcasses. Electricity can come from wind, solar, nuclear, etc. Personally mine is 100% wind energy.
Gasoline is transported by gasoline-burning vehicles. Electricity is transported over wires, further reducing CO2 emitted from transportation.

I mean we can go down a big rabbit hole about the environmental costs but the EV always wins out, if not instantly.

Bikes and ebikes (or even just walking) are obviously going to produce a crapton less CO2 than either.