this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
512 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

59235 readers
3184 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
512
Tesla Cybertruck's stiff structure, sharp design raise safety concerns - experts (www.reuters.com)
submitted 11 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
232 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Tesla Cybertruck's stiff structure, sharp design raise safety concerns - experts::The angular design of Tesla's Cybertruck has safety experts concerned that the electric pickup truck's stiff stainless-steel exoskeleton could hurt pedestrians and cyclists.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I’m pretty sure they meant most efficient in terms of emissions, not energy conversion. Even if you count farting as emissions, bikes put out basically no emissions. You’d have to get 100% of your electricity from renewables to match them in an electric car.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Poor energy conversion means more emissions. 🤦‍♂️

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Are you honestly going to tell me that you think a person riding a bicycle produces more emissions than a person driving a car?