this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
103 points (98.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5306 readers
491 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
103
Air-Conditioning Use Will Surge in a Warming World, U.N. Warns | By 2050, electricity use for cooling could double, driving up the greenhouse gas emissions that cause warming. (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 11 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

wtf are we supposed to do to solve all this?

Maybe nuclear fusion, but that’s down the line (~2030.. bit late) with some skepticism.

[–] sonori@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

If nuclear fission is to expensive and long to build, then how is something that is orders of magnitude more expensive and so complex we haven’t even managed to do it yet going to make things better?