Technology

59300 readers

4750 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

459

Arch and other Linux operating systems Beat Windows 11 in Gaming Benchmarks (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 11 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

88 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Arch and other Linux operating systems Beat Windows 11 in Gaming Benchmarks::ComputerBase benchmarked three different Linux operating systems and found that all three can achieve better gaming performance than Windows 11.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

If that's masochism on disc then what is gentoo and lfs is?)

[–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 1 points 11 months ago

Well Arch seems to entirely lack QA and my experience with it has shown that package maintainers don't seem to care or test stuff.

They updated CUDA before the NVIDIA driver a while ago so you couldn't run or compile CUDA programs
For some reason GNOME wasn't loading past the login screen (just freezing on a grey screen with a cursor)
GLFW somehow got stuffed up such that the titlebar went all bad and had performance issues with Vulkan

Gentoo at least seem to have some QA and LFS must be Masochism on a disc: Ultimate Edition, but at least with LFS you're learning how a Linux system is put together. Unlike Arch where you spend more time dealing with the problems of the community