this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
191 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59457 readers
3512 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tesla's reputation slumps as GM, Ford climb - Tesla ranked 62nd by reputation among the 100 most visible brands, tumbling from 12th last year and 8th in 2021.::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LifeLikeLady@lemmy.world 97 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

Terrible build quality ✔️

Over priced ✔️

Competition catching up quickly ✔️

End of Tesla's monopoly on charging stations✔️

A terrible looking and expensive failed launch of a brick of steel✔️

Crazy alt right NEO-NAZI founder who's actively trying to sink every brand he touches ✔️ mate.

The look on Elon's face when it all comes crashing down... Priceless.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ca 37 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Musk isn't even Tesla's founder, BTW. Musk just bought the place.

[–] No1@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

This is true but misleading. When Musk invested in Tesla and became chairman of the board, they hadn't even begun development on a vehicle. They just had an idea and had talked with Lotus. There's plenty to dislike about Musk. You don't need to mislead.

[–] hglman@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Cars that have never had a style update. Now that they exist in meaningful numbers they look old and tired.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Honestly that’s one thing I don’t mind. It’s a pretty solid design and it works well so why make changes just for changes sake?

[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

They just updated one of them, I believe the 3. But that was possible when they had no competition.

[–] IamAnonymous@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

It’s not an “end of charging station monopoly” when all the companies are partnering with Tesla for its charging station network after failing to set up one for their own.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ca 12 points 11 months ago

That's a weird way of saying that all manufacturers will from now adhere to the NACS or SAE J3400 charge standard, further breaking down the barriers to locked in--or monopolized--charge networks. It's also a very weird way of saying that a common charge standard will further diversify stakeholdership in an already pretty diversified charge network stakeholdership ecosystem.

[–] naonintendois@programming.dev 6 points 11 months ago

The plug is becoming a standard. There are still many more stations needed to increase EV usage for people who live in apartments or doing road trips. Not everyone is relying on them for providing charging. It's sad that they're the only ones who actually maintain their infrastructure

[–] casmael@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago