this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Main

139 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mohankohan@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (5 children)

If club are found to have breached spending rules in next set of accounts, action will be taken by end of May under changes brought in to speed up process

Ouch, that's a deadly one-two punch.

[–] Krillin113@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I mean if you already were being investigated and you broke the same rules again you’re a fucking dumbass beyond measure.

Shitty situation for the fans though

[–] zzonked7@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

It's not as clear cut as that because it's not as simple as having budget of £105m and spending £124.5m, though that's the final tally. They lost far more than £124.5m over 3 seasons, they lost closer to £370m but were allowed to write some of it off per the rules.

My understanding is that their argument is twofold, 1) They think they should have been able to write off more of the losses and 2) There were good reasons that they had reduced income that tipped them over (covid, no transfer fee for Sigurdsson and unexpectedly poor results in the league).

The difficulty is a team can invest with an expectation that it will return better results and money, but football is unpredictable and if it doesn't work out then you can get punished like this. You could definitely argue they acted recklessly and took an unacceptable risk, but it's not just outright stupidity.

It's a 3 year rolling loss tally, if they get punished again then it's likely partly the same mistake as last time, not a fresh one.

[–] RaspberryBirdCat@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Given that the accounts are over a three year period it's more like being penalized twice for screwing up the same year.

[–] fedrats@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

lol at the EPL eyeing the relegation line and docking whatever points it takes to send them down,

[–] cherlin@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They can fuck over everton immediately, but man city may not see anything for 2+ years? Wtf is this?

[–] Kevgongiveit2ya@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It’s been 5 years. Investigation was made public in 2018

[–] a_lumberjack@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

The trick is to be massively corrupt in a way that takes fucking forever to bring to trial. To get super advanced, you need to be under active indictments in four different cities under four completely different categories of law.

[–] pork_chop_expressss@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Yet Man City has taken a few years and won't see action, if there is any, until 2024/25 most likely.

[–] Mozezz@alien.top 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Im struggling to think how exactly we’d have fucked up the finances since when we got done

We’ve not really spent any money on transfers without selling players and our wages have drastically dropped

Sounds abit clickbaity to me tbh

[–] SpeechesToScreeches@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah it's not a 'we suspect they might have broken the rules again so will be punished again', just a 'Everton still have to play by the same rules despite already being punished for breaking them before', it's a non story

[–] PM_ME_VIRGIL_PICS@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Joyce usually isn’t the clickbaity type