this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
117 points (96.1% liked)

Furry Technologists

1310 readers
1 users here now

Science, Technology, and pawbs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Enshittification begins again

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 30 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, I'm not sure what this article is even trying to say; this has been happening for a while now.

Like, it's shitty, but it's not even the shittiest thing Github has done. I'm more annoyed about the whole AI stuff, the fact that they have de-facto veto powers on most open source projects and that they don't let you have multiple accounts to separate your professional life from your cringe life.

Modern times are really "people should get off of X platform but don't because people don't want to move".

[–] yote_zip@pawb.social 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

they don’t let you have multiple accounts to separate your professional life from your cringe life

Can you post more on this? I found this article that seems to recommend you only use one account, but doesn't seem to suggest that they enforce it. I have like 8 GitHub accounts with a cringe/professional mix, so hopefully that's not something I need to fix. (Ironically I usually stay logged out anyway)

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/github-terms/github-terms-of-service#3-account-requirements

Here, I'm afraid. Third bullet. Whether or not they enforce it is another matter.

Sucks because I kinda might want to contribute some things to projects that I don't want people to know professionally.

Or maybe I can just make my profile private and hope nobody goes looking too hard.

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They...have an "add account" feature right in their UI though. They are obviously okay with multiple accounts. Perhaps it is an abuse thing like if they notice you sock puppeting or something.

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 1 points 11 months ago

That's for if you have a personal account and one provided by your company.

In some cases, you may need to use multiple accounts on GitHub.com. For example, you may have a personal account for open source contributions, and your employer may also create and manage a user account for you within an enterprise.

[–] yote_zip@pawb.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ruh roh. Yeah I'm involved with several projects that I'd rather not trace back to my other identities, and I make a new GitHub account per job. Even if they start enforcing it I imagine it's quite hard for them to actually figure out what's all connected without amping up their identification schemes with mandatory phone numbers and etc. I guess we'll burn that bridge when we get to it.

[–] flappy@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh, they do.

I didn't clear my cookies/use a vpn to sign up for multiple accounts.

All registered accounts, including my main one, were locked. All secondary ones were shadowbanned. I had to message support to get restrictions on my main removed.

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Did they actually unlock your account?

All the horror stories I've read about this sort of thing usually end in "I tried to contact support/submit an appeal but they told me to take a hike".

[–] flappy@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Yes, they unlocked one of them.

[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’m not sure where they have their information from, I have 2 very unique, personal accounts on github and i’ve had zero issues.

first is my public “portfolio” page and occasional professional/corporate client connected account, it is very much an account that you would “know” my info, linkedin, keybase, etc identifiers. Then i have a personal one that I use to contribute more anonymously, which I use to further opensource projects that my clients wouldn’t want me contributing to due to conflict of interest. I’m not talking espionage levels, just modified supportive code that i have contributed to an enterprise that doesn’t support opensource initiatives (aka, they’d pay a fine if it ever came public).

[–] yote_zip@pawb.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They just replied with this link, which has it listed as the third bullet. I suspect they don't actually care enough to do anything, but I had no idea that it was in their ToS.

[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

ha, good info. I wouldn’t meet that violation because my main public account is a pro account. But, you’re not alone in multiple accounts and I assume unless you’re violating other TOS, you’ll be fine.

[–] flappy@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Giving them money is likely the reason you still have your accounts.

Log into another free account on your machine and see what happens.

[–] SloanTheServal@pawb.social 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Modern times are really “people should get off of X platform but don’t because people don’t want to move”.

More like "people should get off of X platform but don't because people they regularly interact with don't want to move, and because herd mentality"

It's the same reason why people tolerate YouTube's bullshit. The audience won't switch to a platform without content, and the content creators won't switch to a platform without an audience.

[–] AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What do you mean they don't let you have multiple accounts? I've had three accounts for years, and I'm not doing anything to hide the fact they're all me.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

That's more likely to target farming, like 1 person with 1000 accounts that are used as bots. At least I hope so.