this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
119 points (94.7% liked)

World News

32297 readers
694 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Potatofish@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And death to Israel? You forgot that part. I'm all for the rest.

[–] unwellsnail@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You'd be a fool to believe they'd stop there

[–] unwellsnail@sopuli.xyz 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Why, because Israel didn't stop where they agreed? Maybe stop projecting the real actions of the oppressor onto the ones being oppressed.

We have no idea what Hamas would or wouldn't do in the future, only what has already happened and what they publicly declare. In any situation, what Hamas wants is largely irrelevant if nothing is done to stop Israel from continuing their decades long ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

We don't have to take them at their word though.

[–] Triton420@mander.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

Yes we do have a history showing what hamas will do and it isn’t pretty

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -3 points 11 months ago

Both sides had planned to push out the other in '48. If the battles worked out differently oppressor/oppressed would just be reversed

[–] Potatofish@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago

What's a rocket or two in the grand scheme of things after 1996. I suppose just a nice hello. OK, now you go.