this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
261 points (95.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5306 readers
527 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
261
Eat Less Meat Is Message for Rich World in Food’s First Net Zero Plan (finance.yahoo.com)
submitted 1 year ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
110 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hmm... I understand the desire for reducing the spread of damaging theories, but there also seems to be an element of burying one's head in the sand to that approach. Wouldn't it be more productive to explain logically and dispassionately what the problems with the thought processes are rather than ignore the problem?

How does that approach build consensus to effect meaningful policy change?

Simply ignoring the person's position doesn't convince them to vote differently.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't care for voting. I don't care to debate.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Fair enough! That makes sense to me.