this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

142 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Conankun66@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I am not German so maybe I am missing something but I can’t really see the equivalence between Wolfsburg and Leverkusen against Hoffenheim and Leipzig

in general the two broad categories of german clubs are "tradtionsclub"(tradition club) and "Kommerzclub" (commercial club, the plastics).

we do make further distinctions within that second category (Leipzig is seen as by far the worst, then hoffenheim and then wolfsburg and leverkusen) but what they all share is that they are controlled privately and undermine 50+1, so they are grouped together as plastic

[–] J-LG@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I see, that's interesting. Thanks for the cultural context, makes sense.

[–] TheTimon@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They still have a big financial advantage for not being owned by the fans but by Bayer AG a ethicly dubious company at the least. Fans just don't like that, they take away a spot in the bundesliga from Fan-Owned Clubs, they take away International campaings from Clubs who would actually fill their stadium in these international games, who could actually use the money. All 4 clubs make the leage worse.

[–] OnlineDopamine@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

We funnel all of our profits back to Bayer and can’t nearly generate as much sponsoring revenue in parts due to our close association with another company.

The sponsorship is obviously a net positive for the club but there are drawbacks.