Technology

59342 readers

5372 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

538

A Novel Approach to Youtube Ads (9to5google.com)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by atrielienz@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

127 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Instead of blocking them, this extension speeds them up to x16 and also mutes the ad. Experiencing a 30 second ad in 2 seconds is pretty funny. And it works on Edge and Chrome.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

If YouTube truly succeeded in forcing 90 seconds of unavoidable ads with no exceptions without paying $20/month then I genuinely think YouTube won't be a monopoly for very long.

[–] creditCrazy@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Honestly I've tinkerd with the idea of making a genuine ad free YouTube competition. But the industry standard is operating at a loss. No one wants to pay for a YouTube service and no one wants to watch ads. If anyone has any ideas on how a YouTube competitor could stay afloat I'm all ears.

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

Oh I don't expect it to be free and ad free. Just not as invasive as it is now, the ads are relentless especially when the form factor of videos are usually proportionally quite short.

Alternatively have a reasonable price for add free. Google is an enormous company which operate as a loss for monopoly and exposure reasons, they've put themselves into this position

[–] remus989@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

How can a competitor handle Google dropping ads and/or pricing and run at a loss until the competitor is bought or destroyed outright? Google has too much money and existing infrastructure for someone other than say Amazon to compete with YouTube and god help us if that’s the alternative we get.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

How can a new competitor acquire content creators to actually threaten the monopoly? Genuine question.

[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 2 points 11 months ago

They can't. Unless YouTube fucks up big time, nothing will touch it, especially since they are the most "generous" with their payouts to creators. Only if someone steps up with a platform just as good as YouTube (UI, infrastructure) AND pays a bigger share, maybe it will happen. But video streaming is a thankless business so I personally doubt it will happen anytime soon.