Linux

48290 readers

636 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Why are there so many (rust) GTK apps and so little Qt ones? (feddit.de)

submitted 1 year ago by Pantherina@feddit.de to c/linux@lemmy.ml

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I always see new GTK apps popup on Flathub. I dont really care and think GTK looks fancy, although CSD suck a bit and they waste space and often functionality.

But they work, are solid, and do what they should.

Qt on the other hand may seem more like a complex job to code with. I dont actually think so, but I heard especially writing rust with GTK is way better than with Qt.

I like KDE a lot, and even though I am excited for Cosmic I think Qt is the better toolkit for many things and a lot of time. But Dolphin seems to suffer from memory safety issues all the time, as well as other projects.

Do you have experience in rust, using GTK or Qt? How do they compare?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

a few reasons I think, the QT bindings are split between cxx-qt and qmetaobject-rs . Neither of which are super great IMO, but even if they were, we have UI frame works like slint and egui which are already becoming quite good, slint has a good native look that resembles QT so people wanting that design can use that instead.

[–] Giooschi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

slint has a good native look that resembles QT

It doesn't just resembles QT, it uses QT as backend.

[–] drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

It's worth stating that QT is an optional backend and is only used for native styling, even the pure rust, Native styling still looks close to native. QT is fully optional and is not a dep even for linux apps

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Damn, thanks for the tip! So does it support native KDR Styling and all too?

Could in theory Apps like Dolphin be entirely rewritten in Rust, using Slint as Frontend, and still be native in KDE?

[–] Giooschi@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

From their github:

NOTE: When Qt is installed on the system, the native style uses Qt's QStyle to achieve native looking widgets.

I'm not that familiar with KDE's styling, but if I remember well it should just be a Qt style, so it should work.

Regarding rewriting Dolphin, I think in theory you could do that, in practice it's probably pretty challenging given the amount of features Dolphin has.