this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
606 points (91.5% liked)

Memes

45189 readers
1136 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
606
Get Bread Get Dead (lemmy.ml)
submitted 10 months ago by Grayox@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Please reflect on the fact that until you joined the discussion, we didn’t talk about equating success to luck.

Afterwards, you will likely notice that your jackpot argument reinforces mine.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Please reflect on the fact that until you joined the discussion,

Please lets not be condescending here. I will rephrase, instead of success I will say wealth. I used the two interchangeably as many people judge your success based on your wealth.

we didn’t talk about equating success to luck.

Didn't you say this here.

On the other side of the argument, the amount of people that work harder and smarter than any given billionaire and have nothing is simply staggering. If it wasn’t down to luck, they’d all be billionaires.

[–] Slotos@feddit.nl 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wealth itself is a stronger predictor for future wealth than individual performance.

That quote of mine doesn’t talk about success, nor wealth itself for that matter. You’re ignoring everything in the message to argue against a statement that was never made in the first place.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Wealth itself is a stronger predictor for future wealth than individual performance.

I agree with that.