this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
1488 points (97.9% liked)

linuxmemes

20770 readers
1415 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Luigi (with Linux Mint logo) and Mario (Ubuntu logo) come in

Mother: It's-a the Ubuntu Bros!

Linux Mint (Luigi): Mama why-a you never remember my name?

Mother: I'm-a sorry Green Ubuntu

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cameron_vale@lemm.ee 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

Why does anybody use ubuntu etc when they could use debian?

It comes with like 6 desktops right in the installation. And there are another 20 more available too.

And ubuntu etc is just debian with a fancy desktop, right?

And debian is fast, lightweight and stable as heck. Don't they use it on the spaceshuttle?

[–] quackers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 9 months ago (2 children)

because how tf am i gonna install internet drivers without internet.

[–] AnxiousOtter@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Same way you install the OS without internet, put it on a thumb drive.

[–] quackers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well sure, but if i have to figure out what to get, where to get it, how to install a driver from a tar.gz file, maybe i just install ubuntu instead.
I opted for fedora instead, until it died on an nvidia update (as every distro inevitably seems to do with me) and fucked off back to windows. Linux desktop has not treated me well so far in any case.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It will be the non-free drivers package. If installing Debian, also grab the non-free drivers, you'll need it for wifi

[–] quackers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago

yes, but i cant do that without internet is the point

[–] mellejwz@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

No need, if Ubuntu works out of the box then Debian also works most of the time. I've never had to install drivers for ethernet or wifi. The installer is a bit less graphical, but it will connect in a few "clicks", even wifi works for the installer.

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My guess is: Too outdated packages. Debian experimental fixes this, but it's not noob friendly to enable those. And flatpack is too recent.

[–] camelbeard@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This was the one for me, was running Debian a few years ago, I was really happy with how everything worked.

But at work I noticed a lot of tools I needed where pretty old. Like an old version of maven or an old version of Firefox or npm.

You can probably work around it, but I just went back to Mint again.

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's gotten better uith flatpak, or if you can handle it: distrobox.

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Why does anybody use ubuntu etc when they could use debian?

Debian is good, but people working on polishing a thing from 9 to 5, 5 days a week can do a lot.

[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

ubuntu has firewall protection already to go. I heard if you used debian you have to install UFW or other things on your own

[–] cameron_vale@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

ok that's one thing about ubuntu that I didn't know.

[–] DaBPunkt@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

For what you need a firewall on a desktop-client?

[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

For everything? You still shouldnt be running all ports open around. As it would ease the work of hackers getting backdoor access.

[–] DaBPunkt@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So just close the ports (or more precise: Do not open them, as "closed" is the default for most software on Linux).

[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yup, and if some bad software wants to create malicious webserver they can not do it as all the ports that are open are used in a legit way. And thus can not really communicate either one or the other way.

[–] DaBPunkt@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

A webserver listens on port 80 or 443. Neither port can be claimed by a normal user (no port below 1024 can). But yes if you manage more than your own user on a desktop AND these other users are not allowed to start programs on their own THEN a firewall can be helpful; but this is not a normal situation for a desktop-client, isn’t it?

[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Only moonmen use debian

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure they need real time systems on a spaceshuttle

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I think the real time requirement can be relaxed for self contained experiment packages. And given that the shuttle ran a healthy number of student experiments, it's pretty likely that X system has appeared.

I believe crew laptops for email and stuff are also running non real-time systems.

[–] KuraiWolfGaming@pawb.social 1 points 9 months ago

For the main systems, sure. But non critical systems can pretty much run nearly anything.