Star Citizen

1 readers

1 users here now

A general discussion place for all things related to Star Citizen.

All game related discussion is welcome here, but if there's a specific community for the content you are about to create, try to post it in the correct one. This allows community members to filter out the types of content they want to see.

Here are the current sub-communities:

!screenshots@citizensgaming.com - for in-game screenshots

!videos@citizensgaming.com - for video related content

!issues@citizensgaming.com - for SC bug reports

!community@citizensgaming.com - discussion around this Lemmy instance

!support@citizensgaming.com - support for this Lemmy instance

!off_topic@citizensgaming.com - anything else unrelated to SC

Rules

Don't be a dick. It's fine to disagree with someone's comments, just do it in a respectful way.
Content must be related to Star Citizen. For non-SC discussions, use the !off_topic community.
No org or giveaway promotion.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lemmy_admin_bmbYy@citizensgaming.com

JeffCraig@citizensgaming.com

Arrastra Discussion (citizensgaming.com)

submitted 11 months ago by WunderBliss@citizensgaming.com to c/starcitizen@citizensgaming.com

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I haven't been this excited for a ship in a while.

To me it completely replaces the MOLE, even for undercrewed operations, and potentially even for occasional solo use, since most of the functionality is centralised on the bridge, so you won't have to run down ladders and elevators to reach the mining heads, plus they are on rails now so no need to swap back and forth to the pilot seat to make small adjustments. Of course, it really depends on how engineering gameplay impacts large ships with small/solo crews.

And 500+ scu of cargo? Crazy. It's even got a tractor beam for loading/unloading.

For me it was an instant buy (well, upgrade). Anyone else?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it looks really cool, I'm currently figuring out what to melt and what to upgrade if I did get one but that brings me to the point which is the cost. At that price, it's not that far off an Orion so it could be better to make the leap to that.

But yeah, not sure. It is a really cool looking ship and it's probably going to be great to use as well. I actually don't have a mining ship right now but have enjoyed that loop in the past so will probably pick up either this or the Orion.

[–] WunderBliss@citizensgaming.com 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's definitely close enough in price to an Orion to raise that question.

The Orion seems like the kind of ship you park in an asteroid belt and just go to town on, and have other ships come to it for support, like maybe a hull c come to collect the refined resources, maybe a herc or something to resupply, etc. so the Orion can keep nomming on asteroids.

The arrastra though seems a bit more active, plays more like any other mining ship, just bigger and with a built in refinery so you don't need to worry about quant timers, etc. which is more my style for sure.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah that's true, in the announcement video they did mention the use cases were slightly different too and the Arrastra can also mine on planets.

Anyway, after some long overdue fleet consolidation I CCUed to one for $60 which I think is worth it. Didn't make the leap to the Orion.

[–] WunderBliss@citizensgaming.com 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah I did the same, although I did actually apply the CCU which isn't something I'd usually do for an unreleased ship