this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
904 points (99.9% liked)

196

16552 readers
2031 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SexyTimeSasquatch@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Add Tibet, Xianchang, Manchuria, as separate countries and switch Inner Mongolia to being part of Mongolia and now we're getting somewhere.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Taiwan didn't even recognize Mongolia's independence until 2002. Good luck getting the KMT to accept Tibet's or Uyghurstan's independence.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Next thing you know, Western Taiwan decides it's time to make North Korea their brand new province, because "historic grounds" or something

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

My personal bet is they'll go for Outer Manchuria. They still see the treaty of Aigun as an unequal treaty and as things stand the international community wouldn't even bother writing a strongly worded letter if they decided to rectify it.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

i mean considering taiwan's position surely they'd be more than happy to get the mainland in return for letting some remote areas be independent?

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

IDK about Xinjiang but China's current state of water security basically means no government of China will accept Tibetan independence without basically getting puppet state control over them.

[–] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Why Manchuria?

[–] Professional_Human@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

White bread of Chinese balkanization right here

[–] SexyTimeSasquatch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The meat and potatoes of Chinese imperialism.