this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

142 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DoX6ConorGallagher@alien.top 2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Chelsea and Everton the "most improved" while both having a generally awful start to the season is a fun indication of how useful xG is.

[–] LackingSimplicity@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Chelsea and Everton the "most improved" while both having a generally awful start to the season is a fun indication of how useful xG is.

Except Everton have been pretty good and are easily the most underrated team in the leauge. I'd argue they were pretty unlucky and were shit aginst Luton which apparently is the only relevant game of the season for judging them on. If anything, their quality on the pitch compared with their xG is a lot more similar than when compared to how many points they've gained.

xG is worthless for you because you couldn't finish of a virgin who'd been edging for 8 hours.

[–] DoX6ConorGallagher@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

>Active in /r/Genshin_Impact

>Insults others serial prowess

Excuse me while I go die laughing

[–] sandbag-1@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Chelsea finished 12th last season and are 10th now

Everton finished 17th last season and are 14th now without the deducted points

The teams have both improved

[–] No-Shoe5382@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I think this should be viewed at the end of the season.

Because every time I've watched either Everton or Chelsea they've looked much better than they did last season, and typically performances come before results.

But if you were to ask me the two most improved clubs in terms of performance this season I would say Chelsea and Everton, closely followed by us.

[–] GorillazWelfare@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I’ve always been so apprehensive at how quickly the public adopted it as the end-all-be-all stat. It’s flawed and subjective (the fact different sites have different models). It’s similar to how basketball fans use the TS% to settle debates nowadays.