this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
434 points (98.2% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2299 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Womble@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah the reason HK went the way it did was because China could credibly say "Give it to us or we take it". Argentina already tried the take it by force way, when their military was in a much better state than it is now, and there was effectively no military garrison on the islands. Argentina have pretty much zero leverage here.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

last I heard, the people on falkland don't want to be argentinian either.

Which should be the biggest, and loudest, reason to oppose Argentinian demands for the island.

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Majority of people in Hong Kong at the time didn't want to be part of China either, a lot of them left China already for a reason.

[–] Rediphile@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Hong Kong was a completely different situation as the British signed a specific lease for Hong Kong with a set end date that was known all along. Nothing like that happened with the Falklands.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

That's a common misconception, the 99 year lease was on the New Territories, rural areas in the north of HK. Hong Kong Island and Kowloon (the heavily urban bits you think of when you think Hong Kong) were under no such lease, they had been permanently ceded to Britain when it was just a fishing village on the coast.