Selfhosted

39893 readers

350 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

Banana Pi BPI-M7 - More Reasons to Avoid the Raspberry Pi (www.cnx-software.com)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by TCB13@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

71 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Banana Pi BPI-M7 single board computer is equipped with up to 32GB RAM and 128GB eMMC flash, and features an M.2 2280 socket for one NVMe SSD, three display interfaces (HDMI, USB-C, MIPI DSI), two camera connectors, dual 2.5GbE, WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2, a few USB ports, and a 40-pin GPIO header for expansion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Depends on your use-case. If you want to use GPIO and other low level features, yes the Pi is faster to get going, if you're just using ir for a NAS/storage then a board like that will work out of the box.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

At which point you're better off with a mini pc.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I totally agree with you there. https://lemmy.world/comment/5500098:

For eg. for 100€ you can find an HP Mini with an i5 8th gen + 16GB of ram + 256GB NVME that obviously has a case, a LOT of I/O, PCIe (m2) comes with a power adapter and outperforms a RPi5 in all possible ways. Note that the RPi5 8GB of ram will cost you 80€ + case + power adapter + cable + bullshit adapter + SD card + whatever else money grab - the Pi isn’t just a good option.

I even went further on GPIOs and low level electronics here https://lemmy.world/comment/5500638:

RPi 2B+ for around 10$ nowadays (...) other brand new cheap SBCs such as the Radxa Zero 3W or the Zero 3E or even the Raspberry Pi Zero W. The point is that it doesn't make sense to buy a standard and expensive RPi for things that don't require much CPU. If you don't really need an OS and you code C or MicroPython a 3.5$ ESP32 board as well.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

This is the problem I see with these "high end pi" systems. The benefit of the RPI is low-cost and small form factor along with the GPIO.

When you start to get too expensive you compete with more capable systems in the same price range.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Well, it always depends on the use case. And if you think over the use case, maybe other solutions might even be better.