this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
1382 points (100.0% liked)

196

16490 readers
2776 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
qaz@lemmy.world
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@lemmy.ca
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Qaz@lemmy.ml
qaz@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
1382
measuring rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago by Deegham@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
249 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fal@yiffit.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are percentages too hard for you?

[–] ThisOne@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not nearly as hard as you are working to represent F in chat about personal preference

[–] Fal@yiffit.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I WILL die on this hill. But preference is just what you do with the information, not the usefulness of the scale. 0-100 is the scale. Whether you wear jackets at 50-60 or 60-70 doesn't mean that the scale isn't objectively better.

[–] ThisOne@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh yea I think I do agree with you that the C scale is objectively better.

[–] Fal@yiffit.net 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cope harder. F is objectively better for environment. C is objectively better for scientific calculation

[–] ThisOne@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oof you really trying to get others to die on that hill with ya huh?

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You're objectively dumb