this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
1158 points (96.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
954 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    1158
    Distros bad (feddit.de)
    submitted 11 months ago by Pantherina@feddit.de to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    355 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    All I’m getting from this is that arch is easier than I expected and will give me a much better end result than the distros I’m used to.

    [–] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Absolutely yes to the first part, just use archinstall. The second is in large part up to you, but pacman + AUR are amazing.

    [–] Acters@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

    Yeah, this is the way, doing it manually is fun and all but its highly unnecessary extra effort as there are very little reasons as all of it is just configuration of the system. Archinstall is just the Text-GUI version that still offers the customize ability of the install. Heck you can load a configuration file that you can make before hand so that you don't need to babysit the installation and can reproduce it in other systems/PCs.

    [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    I suppose this depends entirely on your expectations?

    [–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 months ago

    Arch is a doddle these days, but still has excellent documentation, which was always it's strength (archwiki is life), read, learn. Personally it led me via fedora for stability to immutable ublue kinoite. When NixOS is there (stable), so shall I be, in the meantime I am happy with a distrobox arch with the AUR for all my random needs...

    [–] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

    It is very manual though. For rolling release BTRFS snapshots like on Fedora and Opensuse Tumbleweed are a total must.