this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
454 points (100.0% liked)

196

16244 readers
2042 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
454
Root Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by OniiFam@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

But for real, with the prevalence of AI its only a matter of time before the narrative becomes that it never happened and the photo we're all familiar with is just an AI fake.

And it wont matter howe much evidence there is that the photo existed for decades before good AI, that can just be handwaved away. We are truly in the post-truth era.

[–] Kerandir@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

The most realistic takes often are.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What would be the point of trying to censor the tank man photo? People act like he was killed or something - he just stopped in front of the tanks, climbed on one for a minute, then was led away by bystanders. https://youtu.be/qq8zFLIftGk

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago

I don't think he lived happily ever after, though

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It's by far the most widely know photo from the incident and the CCP already denies anything happened on that day. Other than a change to their "outright ignore its existence policy" then why wouldnt they try and censor it?

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 10 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/qq8zFLIftGk

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.