this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
1263 points (98.1% liked)

Games

16834 readers
1088 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
1263
Gabe Newell on why game delays are okay: 'Late is just for a little while. Suck is forever.' (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 1 year ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
137 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Duke nukem forever says hi

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That game was both late and suck

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apparently it managed to get worse. The leak of the 2001 build that people are patching up actually looks really cool.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My understanding is that the released game was not a "descendant" of that 2001 preview. The game was totally scrapped and then a new iteration was started years later which is what eventually was released. So it's not like the game was actually being worked on for a decade. More like the released game (which was only built over a couple of years) had the same name as a scrapped game from a decade prior.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That is precisely what happened.

I was merely framing it that the 2001 build was seemingly on the road to being a good, or at least faithful Duke Nukem game but management kept dictating changes to it to keep up with gaming fads. Eventually Gearbox just shoved an entirely different build out the door.

The 2001 build was victim to a lot of start-stop-start-stop development.