this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
205 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17926 readers
42 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For me its honestly a ton of my work software (digital forensics), shit is too niche to be replaced by good FOSS options. Cellebrite, Magnet Axiom, etc. Autopsy is great and free and has a linux version but it simply cannot get the same level of data without a pretty nutty level of custom code.

And the biggest side effect of this is FUCKING WINDOWS. God I would replace this nightmare OS in a heartbeat if the aforementioned work software would make linux compatible versions. We have legitimately wasted 10k hours dealing with windows bullshit that would not be a problem in linux. Though im sure linux would take a different 10k for its own problems.

What about you guys? Doesn't have to be work related, thats just the thorn in my side right now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fulano@lemmy.eco.br 91 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Whatsapp

And no, I can't simply stop using or ask friends to move to an alternative. I'm from Brazil and that thing is so popular and mainstream, that even stores or public services use it.

Just this week, I had to report an animal abuse case to the authorities, and the official communication channel I had to use was through whatsapp.

It's sad to see how dependent of a single proprietary service for something so important we allowed ourselves to become...

[–] asap@feddit.de 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can use a FOSS app at your end to chat with WhatsApp users, if this isn't something you're already aware of. Element.io plus a bridge. Beeper.com is a turnkey platform that sorts it all out for you.

It doesn't help replace WhatsApp as a platform, but perhaps it would suit you?

[–] fulano@lemmy.eco.br 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have been looking at this possibility, but running a bridge means that I will need to self host a service, which adds one more point of failure, while not really removing whatsapp from my life, so I'm not convinced it's a good alternative.

[–] asap@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That's what beeper.com does. It's also open source, but they handle running it for you.

But absolutely I agree that it doesn't remove WhatsApp from your life, and that's a pain point for me also when I'm working with services in Asia, who like Brasil predominantly work from WhatsApp.

If you don't like Beeper, you could try these guys who host a managed solution (means you don't have to deal with any issues), and let's you offer the service to others:

https://etke.cc/

[–] MediaActivist@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Hey. How have I just found out about this?! Mind blown. Thank you so much for sharing! Franz and such just weren't cutting it for me...this looks amazing.

[–] fulano@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In that case, won't the server have access to my credentials?

[–] asap@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No it won't have your credentials, but you will authorise the bridge as a device, like you would with the web app.

[–] fulano@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, I see. But in that case, won't the server have access to my messages in plain text?

[–] asap@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Yes and no. No, in that the bridge code is published, and it takes no action other than re-encrypting your message with the destination auth. But you have to trust that server. If you don't trust the server, then you can run your own. Running your own Matrix server isn't all that hard; I've done it before and there's an Ansible playbook which does all the heavy lifting for you. But these days I prefer someone to run it for me.

[–] elmodelm@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How often do bridges to proprietary services break though?

I used to run bitlbee to use many chats in my irc ckient like 10-15years ago, and I remember things like google chat plugin breaking at least every month.

[–] asap@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I last ran it myself a couple of years ago, and it was fine. These days I'm using Beeper, and I haven't had any dropouts as an end user. If there are issues, they're dealing with it not me.

[–] Auster@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Likewise from Brazil and likewise would rather see whatsapp gone from my devices. Sadly, I still need it for work and other official matters. Still, I'm slowly but surely abandoning whatsapp, by either convincing people I talk to to migrate to other, less anti-consumer services, migrating myself to sister groups or alternatives in other services, and/or abandoning a group or chat altogether. And all the while being vocal about it by raising my concerns about whatsapp (just saying "I don't like it and you should move too" can be pretty counter-intuitive with our countrymen). Hopefully, this way, I can drop it altogether once it becomes clearly irrelevant.

But this reminds me I haven't deleted/left any chats for a few days, so I'll take the opportunity to do just that.

[–] fulano@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But what do you do when services and institutions in general require you to use whatsapp? That's what is mostly keeping me from deleting that app.

[–] CapedStanker@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well on the bright side, you helped an animal and that is awesome! Yall brazillians in general are pretty awesome peoples.

[–] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago

Someone hasn't watched many gore videos

[–] nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

I second this . It’s really frustrating having 5 or more different messaging apps

[–] Lem453@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The web client on desktop is not terrible. Not great, but not terrible.

[–] mamotromico@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly the current windows desktop app is fairly decent, it’s what makes it bearable to use for me.

[–] MiddledAgedGuy@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I can confirm, sort of. I'm not from there nor have I been to Brazil specifically but I've been to South American and Asian countries where it's nearly as ubiquitous as using native calls and texting in the US.

[–] thingsiplay@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@fulano Oh my, that's terrible! At least they should give another option to communicate!

[–] fulano@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 year ago

Sometimes they do, but then they will take much more time to give you a response.

Sometimes, they simply don't have n alternative, like my city's local service for reporting broken streetlights.