Main

139 readers

1 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

submitted 10 months ago by UglyWanKanobi@alien.top to c/main@soccer.forum

117 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] XxAbsurdumxX@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yes. Adjusted for inflation, the amount Chelsea spent under Abromovich is insane even compared to City.

[–] sewious@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I thought the issue is that when Chelsea got taken over, what they did wasn't "against the rules"

[–] Caesar_Aurelianus@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

There weren't any FFP rules.

Earlier the 3 foreigner rule made clubs rely on regional players so they couldn't just splash money all over.

If there weren't that rule then Berlusconi would've bought the whole Dutch national team

[–] Greasy_Boglim@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Man City pay a lot to players and management under the table though so this is apples and oranges