this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
401 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59235 readers
3184 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This older comment explains how ECH works.

ECH is technically unrelated to DoH, ECH is a HTTP extension not a DNS extension. But it uses the DoH encryption because it can't use the HTTP encryption because of the chicken-and-egg problem explained in that comment, so... it basically latched onto DoH as a solution and in doing that tied the two together.

And to answer your question, DoH is usable on its own without ECH because ECH is not needed for DNS. But ECH is strongly desirable for HTTP, and it also requires DoH, so that's why Mozilla for example activated then as a package deal in Firefox (both or neither).

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In a sense yeah, you want ECH too. It's just that ECH makes up for a HTTP-specific fault. DNS is used for more than HTTP; if you're not using HTTP then DoH is enough.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

It's HTTPS-specific, since HTTP is not encrypted.