this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
1242 points (82.6% liked)

Memes

45726 readers
870 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz 72 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What if, and hear me out on this one, the problem isn't which "-ism" is prevalent. The real problem is that ANY form of power or society needs checks and balances. If those are missing or not enforced, then everything goes to shit. It's a balancing act, not just a matter of black or white.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The whole point of Communism is to balance power away from the 1% and back to the masses. The fact that it is an "-ism" and has decades of propaganda demonozing it, doesnt make that any less true.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The important part is it's not an authoritarian running the show and calling it "communism" or " democracy" when the reality is it's just a plain old oligarchy with a new title applied.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

100% couldn't agree more.

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The whole point of Communism is to balance power away from the 1% and back to the masses

But there needs to be some governing body that is responsible for determining how the power and wealth is distributed. Per the OP's point: if the proper guardrails are not in place, control of that governing body will eventually shift towards a person or party who corrupts it for their own purposes. It doesn't matter what the "point" of a system is, corrupt people will always attempt to take the wheel.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This was legitimately a problem after ww2 where the politically active communists were more heavily involved in the war and a bunch of the human infrastructure of (especially local)democracy got killed by nazis

[–] MrSqueezles@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is why Xi Jinping lives in a giant gilded castle and any negative thing said anywhere about him is censored, just like every other citizen. Everyone's equal.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 year ago

Citation fucking needed, do you even know anyone from China?

[–] jeansibelius@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Just look at "balance power away from 1%" in China, Ruzzia or North Corea. Do you really like it? Or you just read books and not looking at real life examples?

[–] MrSqueezles@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why is there so much communist propaganda on Lemmy? Could it be that reddit is actually good at filtering out state-sponsored content farms?

[–] Cowbee@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Decentralization appeals to leftists, as that's the principle of the ideology, away from bourgeois interests.

I haven't seen evidence of state-sponsored propaganda, though there are people that simp far too hard for China and the CPC on Lemmy though.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You should read capital volume one, it will explain how the problem actually is capitalism

[–] Jungle@linux.community 0 points 1 year ago

Actually, the problem is homelessness.

The solution is either housing (ethical) or genocide (unethical).

Provision of housing for the poor can be achieved by means of social housing programs. These can exist in both communist and capitalist societies. E.g. the Netherlands is capitalist, but there is almost no homelessness thanks to its social housing program. The few homeless that are present are choosing this way of life and are therefore not part of problem.