this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

142 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EmbarrassedMelvin@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Note that the panel only voted 3-2 in favour of saying Bruno's intentional forearm to the head of Jorginho should have been reviewed and been a red card.

The rules are very clear that striking someone intentionally in the head is violent conduct and a red so there is no excuse for getting this wrong. But why might that be the case?

Well this independent panel includes 3 ex players and or coaches. Why are they deemed competent to know the rules and give valid opinions? As we know from punditry players often have shit takes because when they played football they could two foot people from behind or elbow people in the face as they jump up for headers.

[–] SKULL1138@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I agree, you should decide Melvin!

[–] JonstheSquire@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

So you can't trust the referees to get it right? And you can't trust ex-players? And you can't trust ex-coaches?

Who do you think should be making these assessments? Fans who have never actually read the Laws of the Game?