this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Soccer (Closing)

154 readers
1 users here now

This community is being retired in favor of !football@soccer.forum.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bradleycjw@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (26 children)

I still don’t understand this whole clear and obvious error requirement. If the ref misses something, then VAR should intervene and inform the referee to relook at the incident. If he deems his original decision correct, then we move on.

The fact that it’s an error but VAR doesn’t see it as clear and obvious and opts not to direct the ref to the monitor is so weird.

[–] ANAL_TWEEZERS@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (8 children)

It’s so they don’t call the ref over to review every little foul or incident and keep the game flowing.

[–] FalcomanToTheRescue@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Thank you. The ref is still (should be) the authority on the field for the flow of the game. VAR should only get involved when it’s a completely obvious mistake (ie offsides, ref completely missed a head butt). Refs do not always get it right, but VAR doesn’t either. People in this sub want the game to stop everytime there’s a potential disagreement? F that, respect the authority of the expert on the field and let them play the game.

[–] 879190747@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

You don't need an arbitrary rule for that though since it's already covered by the goal or red or pen clause in VAR. So VAR can only step in with important match decisions in the first place.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)