this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

142 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Living_a_Dejavu@alien.top 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

You know, when 2/5 panel members don't believe an intentional forearm to the head away from the play is not worthy of a red, it kind of takes away their credibility.

[–] domalino@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

All 5 of the panel members thought it deserved a red.

[–] Living_a_Dejavu@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

There are two ways to see it though:

Either they know of the conversation between the VAR and the ref (which I highly doubt it) and they think it was not clear and obvious because the ref had seen it.

Or they don't know what was said and they are talking bullshit. Because if there is a red card, away from the play and it is not given, it is clear and obvious.

The rules are very clear, away from the play, hitting a player in the head is a red, there is not much room to maneuver here.

[–] LaughsAtOwnJoke@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

That is even more stupid.

"You missed a red card but don't worry about it"

load more comments (5 replies)