this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
955 points (100.0% liked)

196

16245 readers
2271 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I gwess you missed the part of Fury Road where a political elite class had complete control over the means of existence for everyone else and literally owned breeding slaves.>

Yep, never said anything at all huh?

Sure, sure bud. I'm not refusing to talk to any of you so I dunno, make a point and stop crying.

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yep, never said anything at all huh?

I meant before that.

  1. Someone else: Stop thinking mad max is real
  2. You: Mad Max is literally communism
  3. Me (thinking that it's funny to claim that Mad Max is communism, when all four movies have quite different societal structures depicted): Lol, Fury Road much?
  4. You: You're changing movies! >:(
[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There's that hedging again.

I never said it was real, you're gaslighting because you don't have an actual argument.

No, I said mad max had communism, it does.

Again I didn't say it was communism if nothing else but because it's an incredibly stupid way to phrase it.

You literally changed the movie bud, that's a fact.

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Were is the communism in Mad Max?

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In the original in the communes the fuel boys raid.

In fury road it's the matriarchal commune furiosa is seeking the whole movie, it's quite literally the main plot.

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's a lot of societal structure you gathered from the backstage of the first movie.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You'd need the same to say it doesn't exist in the movie bud. Your point is shit.

[–] Prunebutt@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Or you could just say that it is never stated in the movie and therefore not known? Which would be the honest option?

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

If I slap you in the face but don't tell you I slapped you in the face, have I then slapped your face?

Extrapolation is a thing and even if we hedge as much as you'd like there's more evidence to suggest it does exist in the movies than it doesn't.

Troll on, you're at least entertaining in your inanity.