this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
511 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

58150 readers
3641 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 46 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

For everyone in the back of the room, monopoly in the context doesn't require to literally have no other choice. It's enough for the alternatives to be impractical as in not widely used in practice.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well that's an easy one then, if that's true.

Especially for Apple phones, damn.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern 7 points 10 months ago

Yeah it's pretty obnoxious how much control the app stores have.

It does make device security easier, but

[–] rchive@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is it possible that alternatives are not widely used because most people don't want to use alternatives in the first place?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sure it is. It doesn't change the monopoly position. The real question isn't whether this is a monopoly but whether it's being abused. E.g. imagine if Google charged 99% fee on any sale via the Play Store. Or if Google disallowed alternative methods of payment but their own for any app distributed on the Play Store.