this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
1215 points (93.1% liked)

Leftism

2107 readers
6 users here now

Our goal is to be the one stop shop for leftism here at lemmy.world! We welcome anyone with beliefs ranging from SocDemocracy to Anarchism to post, discuss, and interact with our community. We are a democratic community, and as such, welcome metaposts that seek to amend the rules through consensus. Post articles, videos, questions, analysis and more. As long as it's leftist, it's welcome here!

Rules:

Posting Expectations:

Sister Communities:

!abolition@slrpnk.net !antiwork@lemmy.world !antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world !breadtube@lemmy.world !climate@slrpnk.net !fuckcars@lemmy.world !iwwunion@lemmy.ml !leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com !leftymusic@lemmy.world !privacy@lemmy.world !socialistra@midwest.social !solarpunk@slrpnk.net Solarpunk memes !therightcantmeme@midwest.social !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world !vuvuzelaiphone@lemmy.world !workingclasscalendar@lemmy.world !workreform@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

All money is free. It is not taken from some limited store, but rather created by government, freely.

The value, stability, and legitimacy of money is sustained by the supremacy of state power. By such power, the government both determines the supply and shapes the distribution of money, and is assured never to be insolvent.

No distribution of money is natural or naturally superior.

Money is a social construct directed by political will.

Price inflation currently occurring is largely due to the political choice to distribute money to corporations.

That is, as a consequence of particular political choices, the already imbalanced distribution has become even more unfavorable toward workers.

If the political will were rather toward distributing money to workers, then prices may follow a pattern of gradual inflation, but as long as workers' income keeps pace, workers would not be harmed by it even in the slightly.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Money is not free. The cost of new money is devaluation of old money.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Devaluation is not a cost.

It is, however, a consequence of expanding the money supply.

In turn, however, expansion of supply is not a threat, because of the various capacities for the government to withdraw money, as through taxation, or central bank policy.