this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
1042 points (95.3% liked)

Memes

45595 readers
1236 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When will it be economically viable to dump all the people who have to set up the equipment and all of the people who have to do everything but make the basic structure? Is this 'house set up and entirely built by robots down to the light fixtures with no human intervention' a near future proposition?

[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

When was it economically viable to replace hand-sewn lumber with lumber mills?

Then they went and made portable electric saws. What a world!

And then electric drills! And laser levels!

Remember paper ledgers and abacuses? Ever hear of Microsoft Excel?

We keep making tools that always increase productivity and reduce time and cost. It’s Constant incremental progress, and on a large scale it’s great because it frees up (human) resources to focus on new industry and technology, which furthers the CIP. On the micro scale, there may be a small number of temporarily displaced workers as jobs shuffle around and workers re-skill.

But at this particular intersection of technology, we are at a pretty bad spot. We are on the verge of massive progress in multiple industries, and wealth has concentrated in the elite classes. “Temporarily displaced workers” won’t have the capital to re-skill or invest their own resources into new industry. This is bad.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When was it economically viable to replace hand-sewn lumber with lumber mills?

When they did it. Because they could process a huge amount more lumber. I'm not sure I understand.

[–] Marin_Rider@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

what they are saying is that in the past, technological leaps meant increases in productivity and generally freed the displaced workers into new careers, but this time the sheer scale of change that is imminent doesn't leave time for that. it's going to be bad

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn, you really are stuck in the past, aren't ya

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm stuck in the past because that's not an economically viable thing to do within the foreseeable future?

Would I be stuck in the past because I said I don't think people are going to be commuting by personal jetpack any time soon?

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry... you honestly think people will commute by personal jetpack one day?

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because it's a stupid fucking idea.

Are you under the bizarre impression that every prediction about the future will come true at some point?

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you under the bizzar impression that the world is going to stay the same as it is now?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Literally anything I put is an answer to you

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope. I asked you if literally any prediction about the future will come true. Please answer the question.

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope. That still doesn't answer my question. Yet again: Will literally every prediction about the future come true?

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Will infinite monkeys eventually write all of Shakespeare?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Very suspicious that you refuse to answer a yes or no question. I'm starting to think I should report you for trolling.

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Report me all you want dummy. I literally answered "yup" long ago and you're still digging like you're going to accomplish something.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, I guess I missed your answer. If every prediction about the future is true, it includes all the predictions that humanity will be wiped out relatively soon, meaning that house building will never be fully automated and no one will commute by personal jetpack. But also all housing will be automated and people will commute by personal jetpack.

At the same time.

I can't wait to see how you resolve civilization simultaneously collapsing and advancing.

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, I'm really not getting it. I don't get how two completely opposite things can simultaneously happen. That sounds literally impossible to me.

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Schrodinger would like a word with you

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You really shouldn't talk about things you don't understand. First of all, that wouldn't literally happen to a cat. Secondly, that's not what a quantum superposition is.

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was a porr attempt at a joke. You're allowed to laugh a little dude. I don't know what will happen in the future. Nobody does. I choose to belive in a world heading towards Star Trek over Mad Max. We have bad 'jetpacks' now. Why is it so hard to think they'll upgrade to the point where they will be more accessible in the future. A la what happened the buggies and cars. They would be self driving I presume to.keep everyone more safe cause trusting the average person to fly is a bit much, but idk maybe.

We may also start ww3 at any point. Still don't know the future. I guess for my own sanity I try not to think that way. But like, if you really want to get into thus we have to bring up a lot more subjects, mainly UBI. But, regardless, most jobs being automated, including construction, so everyone gets to be happier is a world I want to live in.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So now you've gone from 'house will definitely construction will definitely be entirely automated" to "I don't know what will happen."

Fascinating.

As far as jetpacks- people don't want to fall to their deaths if they run out of fuel or have engine trouble on the way to work in the morning. I would have thought that would have been obvious.

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I 100% believe it will be, I was trying to relate to you asshole

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have a strange way of relating to people- arguing with them, refusing to answer their questions, making trolling comments, insulting... not to mention never asking the person you're trying to relate to any questions about themselves.

Is this how you claim to relate to others?

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, after you've insulted me, especially since you didn't apologize for it, I'm not particularly interested in telling you about my day. It's strange, but I'm just not inclined to have a friendly discussion with someone who just called me an asshole.