this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
328 points (96.1% liked)

Not The Onion

12269 readers
1434 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stuka@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

...why are courtroom sketch artist still a thing?

[–] Taigagaai@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because it's usually not allowed to take pictures in court

[–] Stuka@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's not a real reason. Most courts are recorded, have stenographer and apparently sketch artists. There's absolutely no reason for court sketch artists to exist in modern society. It's just silly and wreaks of some conservative tradition.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think providing steady employment to a local artist is the worst thing taxes support.

[–] Stuka@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we're gonna be handing out money for totally worthless tasks, oh boy imma be rich

[–] DragonTypeWyvern 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Be real, bro, you already do that.

[–] Stuka@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

....are you illiterate? That's exactly what I said.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I called your current job useless, actually, but don't worry your pretty little head about the details.

[–] Stuka@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, you are illiterate. Ok then.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern 1 points 1 year ago

Had to think a bit for that one, huh?

Understandable for your situation.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Those recordings are not available to the public though, right? Isn’t that the difference? Or am I just mislead here?

I see why the tradition of it feels conservative. But I dunno. I think it’s cool. Seems like good culture.

[–] RidgeDweller@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But why? Seems arbitrary and antiquated

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Think it's to protect the identities of people

[–] Stuka@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's working well, I definitely do not know it's trump Jr there.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not who it's supposed to be protecting lol

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then who’s it supposed to protect?

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Witnesses, the jury, people like that

[–] topinambour_rex@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because AI aren't allowed in court, yet...

[–] Kase@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Why does the defendant have a different number of fingers in every scene?"

-AI flips you off with 13 middle fingers on each hand

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Artist is better for privacy.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only proportionally to how much they suck at their craft

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

More like for not accidentally including jury members in the shot