this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
1712 points (94.6% liked)

Political Memes

5428 readers
2008 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No you're actually at step 0.2: "argue about the definitions of words used in describing the problem".

[–] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's really weird to me that you don't seem to think that understanding what you're asking for is important

[–] AmberPrince@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you don't understand what we are talking about in regards to gun violence at this stage of modern history you have no business debating anyone.

[–] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand that if you're advocating for a ban on assault rifles, which have been banned since 1934, you're not helping anyone but your opponents.

[–] AmberPrince@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, you apparently don't understand. The contemporary public refers to "military-style" weapons as assault rifles. That is, if the gun looks at home in the hands of a soldier in camouflage the general public refers to it as an assault rifle. Again, if you do not understand the discussion around gun violence in today's world you should not be arguing over it.

Also, you're still arguing semantics and haven't actually said anything, in any of your replies to anyone, about what can be done to curb gun violence which is the exact point the OP meme was making.

[–] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago

Semantics my ass. Calling for a ban on something that is already illegal instead of addressing the real problem is going to get you nowhere and make you look foolish in the process.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

Man, those words in my mouth taste weird.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, boss, and when somebody cries about their kid getting hit by a truck on the way to school, you can show up and say, “Well, akshually, it’s a crossover SUV, so it has a unibody.” I’m sure that completely changes the issue. /s

[–] thecrotch@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If there's an epidemic of people being killed by pickup trucks, and a bunch of dipshits are on the internet screaming "we have to ban SUVs!" despite SUVs already being illegal, then yes, yes I will.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social -1 points 1 year ago

Your commitment to pendantry over empathy and common sense is rock solid, at least.