Technology

59300 readers

4699 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

439

Firefox lost users during “failed” Yahoo search deal, says Mozilla CEO (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 year ago by evanuggetpi@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world

95 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Baker's testimony shows that Mozilla depends so much on its deal with Google for revenue that "the biggest loser of a DOJ win in the Google case would be Mozilla."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pandacoder@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Boo fucking hoo. Mozilla isn't a saint and could benefit from a shake up as well. Mozilla's dependency on Google is dangerous for all of us.

The biggest loser if the DOJ doesn't win is literally everyone.

I will bite whatever bullet I have to if it means the end of Google hegemony.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Mozilla’s dependency on Google is dangerous for all of us.

But as you can see above, people leave when they don’t use Google

It’s a user issue not a developer one

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Relying on monopolistic practices is an endorsement of monopoly as a practice, which is why Mozilla is no saint in this situation.

Mozilla's history is littered with poor business decisions that led them down the road to dependency on Google, they shouldn't be excused from them now that a legitimate court case is a threat to their existence.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t see how this case against Google is a threat to Firefox’s existence

It’s not like they can lie under oath and say they left the contract with Yahoo that pays more to be with Google because they’re a Monopoly

This playing into Google’s argument that they are the best is just nice for them

I am aware that popularity and quality aren’t related at all though

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

if the judge ultimately sides with the DOJ and orders Google to break up its search business, not only could Mozilla lose revenue, but Baker's salary could potentially take a big hit, too. Baker confirmed that her salary—$2.5 million in 2020—increased after the Google deal was renewed that year.

According to Dyall's thread, Baker also testified that she thought Mozilla might be forced into a "death spiral" if it is stuck partnering with Microsoft for search as an outcome of the trial.

It's their own assessment that it's an existential threat, I'm just agreeing with it. Google is absolutely the biggest factor in their sustainability as a business.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Well that would be a pretty silly way of dealing with a monopoly

Google should be broken up into many different search engines rather than just picking/choosing which browsers get which search engine